Fairfield, CA vs Grayslake, IL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fairfield
62.9
#1812 nationally
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 13.6). Grayslake leads in cost of living index (108 vs 151). Fairfield leads in walk score (37 vs 28).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fairfield, CA | Grayslake, IL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.9 (#1812) | 76.3 (#362) |
| Population | 120,768 | 20,954 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $605,863 | $374,561 |
| Median Household Income | $98,857 | $110,662 |
| Average Commute | 32.3 min | 28.7 min |
| Walk Score | 37 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 13.6 | 1.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 151 | 108 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+23.0 | D+20.8 |
D-
62.9 Score
Fairfield, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$605,863
Population
120,768
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
37
Pacific
View Fairfield, CA →
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fairfield for: