Fate, TX vs Siloam Springs, AR
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fate
73.8
#671 nationally
Siloam Springs
69.2
#1245 nationally
Fate leads in crime level (1.6 vs 13.6). Fate leads in median household income ($121,935 vs $59,911). Siloam Springs leads in average commute (19.6 min vs 35 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fate, TX | Siloam Springs, AR |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.8 (#671) | 69.2 (#1245) |
| Population | 24,626 | 19,336 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $359,854 | $286,237 |
| Median Household Income | $121,935 | $59,911 |
| Average Commute | 35 min | 19.6 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | N/A |
| Crime Level | 1.6 | 13.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 120 | 91 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+40.9 | R+27.0 |
C
73.8 Score
Fate, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$359,854
Population
24,626
Crime
Low
Median Income
$121,935
Southwest
View Fate, TX →
D+
69.2 Score
Siloam Springs, AR
Small Arkansas city with local appeal
Median Home
$286,237
Population
19,336
Crime
Moderate-High
Median Income
$59,911
Southwest
View Siloam Springs, AR →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fate for:
Swap Siloam Springs for: