Fitchburg, MA vs Holladay, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fitchburg
67
#1469 nationally
Holladay
69.6
#1185 nationally
Holladay leads in crime level (2.7 vs 13.3). Holladay leads in median household income ($106,099 vs $65,963). Holladay leads in average commute (19.4 min vs 26.1 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fitchburg, MA | Holladay, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67 (#1469) | 69.6 (#1185) |
| Population | 41,579 | 30,298 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $409,654 | $851,133 |
| Median Household Income | $65,963 | $106,099 |
| Average Commute | 26.1 min | 19.4 min |
| Walk Score | 43 | 36 |
| Crime Level | 13.3 | 2.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 111 | 139 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+10.0 | D+10.2 |
D+
67 Score
Fitchburg, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$409,654
Population
41,579
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
43
Northeast
View Fitchburg, MA →
D+
69.6 Score
Holladay, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$851,133
Population
30,298
Crime
Low
Walk Score
36
West
View Holladay, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fitchburg for: