Folsom, CA vs Newark, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Folsom
67.8
#1378 nationally
Newark
62.4
#1861 nationally
Folsom leads in crime level (5.0 vs 10.4). Newark leads in walk score (57 vs 31). Folsom leads in average commute (26.1 min vs 31.2 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Folsom, CA | Newark, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.8 (#1378) | 62.4 (#1861) |
| Population | 84,782 | 46,929 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $763,818 | $1,202,648 |
| Median Household Income | $134,935 | $159,465 |
| Average Commute | 26.1 min | 31.2 min |
| Walk Score | 31 | 57 |
| Crime Level | 5.0 | 10.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 165 | 195 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+19.7 | D+53.6 |
D+
67.8 Score
Folsom, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$763,818
Population
84,782
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
31
Pacific
View Folsom, CA →
D-
62.4 Score
Newark, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,202,648
Population
46,929
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
57
Pacific
View Newark, CA →