Folsom, CA vs South Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Folsom
67.8
#1378 nationally
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
South Pasadena leads in walk score (67 vs 31). Folsom leads in cost of living index (165 vs 228). Folsom leads in average commute (26.1 min vs 30.6 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Folsom, CA | South Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.8 (#1378) | 63.6 (#1760) |
| Population | 84,782 | 25,623 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $763,818 | $1,707,701 |
| Median Household Income | $134,935 | $127,882 |
| Average Commute | 26.1 min | 30.6 min |
| Walk Score | 31 | 67 |
| Crime Level | 5.0 | 5.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 165 | 228 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+19.7 | D+32.9 |
D+
67.8 Score
Folsom, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$763,818
Population
84,782
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
31
Pacific
View Folsom, CA →
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Folsom for: