Fontana, CA vs Richland, WA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fontana
63.7
#1746 nationally
Richland
69.9
#1159 nationally
Richland leads in average commute (20.7 min vs 33.3 min). Richland leads in cost of living index (120 vs 141). Fontana leads in walk score (37 vs 34).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fontana, CA | Richland, WA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.7 (#1746) | 69.9 (#1159) |
| Population | 215,465 | 63,757 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $640,652 | $470,131 |
| Median Household Income | $93,230 | $89,283 |
| Average Commute | 33.3 min | 20.7 min |
| Walk Score | 37 | 34 |
| Crime Level | 7.4 | 6.9 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 141 | 120 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+2.1 | R+21.9 |
D
63.7 Score
Fontana, CA
Growing California city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$640,652
Population
215,465
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
37
Pacific
View Fontana, CA →
D+
69.9 Score
Richland, WA
Washington community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$470,131
Population
63,757
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
34
Pacific
View Richland, WA →