Fontana, CA vs Taylorsville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fontana
63.7
#1746 nationally
Taylorsville
68.6
#1308 nationally
Taylorsville leads in average commute (21.6 min vs 33.3 min). Taylorsville leads in cost of living index (111 vs 141). Taylorsville leads in crime level (6.3 vs 7.4).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fontana, CA | Taylorsville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.7 (#1746) | 68.6 (#1308) |
| Population | 215,465 | 57,098 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $640,652 | $499,374 |
| Median Household Income | $93,230 | $81,417 |
| Average Commute | 33.3 min | 21.6 min |
| Walk Score | 37 | 35 |
| Crime Level | 7.4 | 6.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 141 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+2.1 | D+10.2 |
D
63.7 Score
Fontana, CA
Growing California city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$640,652
Population
215,465
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
37
Pacific
View Fontana, CA →
D+
68.6 Score
Taylorsville, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$499,374
Population
57,098
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
35
West
View Taylorsville, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fontana for: