Foster City, CA vs Matthews, NC
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Foster City
63.9
#1730 nationally
Matthews
68.7
#1294 nationally
Foster City leads in walk score (50 vs 16). Foster City leads in crime level (1.9 vs 5.1). Matthews leads in cost of living index (116 vs 276).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Foster City, CA | Matthews, NC |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1730) | 68.7 (#1294) |
| Population | 32,180 | 30,934 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,863,228 | $514,763 |
| Median Household Income | $191,267 | $103,405 |
| Average Commute | 32.4 min | 26.9 min |
| Walk Score | 50 | 16 |
| Crime Level | 1.9 | 5.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 276 | 116 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+50.3 | D+32.9 |
D
63.9 Score
Foster City, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,863,228
Population
32,180
Crime
Low
Walk Score
50
Pacific
View Foster City, CA →
D+
68.7 Score
Matthews, NC
Small North Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$514,763
Population
30,934
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
16
Southeast
View Matthews, NC →
Try a different matchup
Swap Foster City for: