Fremont, CA vs Kirkland, WA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fremont
66.8
#1497 nationally
Kirkland
68
#1358 nationally
Kirkland leads in average commute (25.5 min vs 32.4 min). Kirkland leads in walk score (51 vs 42). Fremont leads in median household income ($155,342 vs $135,608).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fremont, CA | Kirkland, WA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.8 (#1497) | 68 (#1358) |
| Population | 230,504 | 91,194 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,471,931 | $1,212,741 |
| Median Household Income | $155,342 | $135,608 |
| Average Commute | 32.4 min | 25.5 min |
| Walk Score | 42 | 51 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 1.7 |
| School Rating | 9 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 185 | 179 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+53.6 | D+51.7 |
D
66.8 Score
Fremont, CA
East Bay family haven
Median Home
$1,471,931
Population
230,504
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Pacific
View Fremont, CA →
D+
68 Score
Kirkland, WA
Washington community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$1,212,741
Population
91,194
Crime
Low
Walk Score
51
Pacific
View Kirkland, WA →