Frisco, TX vs Kalamazoo, MI
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Frisco
72.4
#895 nationally
Kalamazoo
71.9
#947 nationally
Frisco leads in median household income ($134,891 vs $48,649). Kalamazoo leads in walk score (47 vs 26). Kalamazoo leads in average commute (17.5 min vs 29.4 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Frisco, TX | Kalamazoo, MI |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.4 (#895) | 71.9 (#947) |
| Population | 219,587 | 73,126 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $649,173 | $245,332 |
| Median Household Income | $134,891 | $48,649 |
| Average Commute | 29.4 min | 17.5 min |
| Walk Score | 26 | 47 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 35.2 |
| School Rating | 9.2 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 88 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+11.2 | D+17.7 |
C-
72.4 Score
Frisco, TX
Sports City USA
Median Home
$649,173
Population
219,587
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Southwest
View Frisco, TX →
C-
71.9 Score
Kalamazoo, MI
Michigan community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$245,332
Population
73,126
Crime
Very High
Walk Score
47
Midwest
View Kalamazoo, MI →