Frisco, TX vs Lawndale, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Frisco
72.4
#895 nationally
Lawndale
63.3
#1777 nationally
Lawndale leads in walk score (82 vs 26). Frisco leads in median household income ($134,891 vs $76,213). Frisco leads in cost of living index (118 vs 158).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Frisco, TX | Lawndale, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.4 (#895) | 63.3 (#1777) |
| Population | 219,587 | 30,155 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $649,173 | $786,284 |
| Median Household Income | $134,891 | $76,213 |
| Average Commute | 29.4 min | 25.8 min |
| Walk Score | 26 | 82 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 16.3 |
| School Rating | 9.2 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 158 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+11.2 | D+32.9 |
C-
72.4 Score
Frisco, TX
Sports City USA
Median Home
$649,173
Population
219,587
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Southwest
View Frisco, TX →
D
63.3 Score
Lawndale, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$786,284
Population
30,155
Crime
High
Walk Score
82
Pacific
View Lawndale, CA →