Frisco, TX vs South Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Frisco
72.4
#895 nationally
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
South Pasadena leads in walk score (67 vs 26). Frisco leads in cost of living index (118 vs 228). Frisco leads in median household income ($134,891 vs $127,882).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Frisco, TX | South Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.4 (#895) | 63.6 (#1760) |
| Population | 219,587 | 25,623 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $649,173 | $1,707,701 |
| Median Household Income | $134,891 | $127,882 |
| Average Commute | 29.4 min | 30.6 min |
| Walk Score | 26 | 67 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 5.8 |
| School Rating | 9.2 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 228 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+11.2 | D+32.9 |
C-
72.4 Score
Frisco, TX
Sports City USA
Median Home
$649,173
Population
219,587
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Southwest
View Frisco, TX →
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Frisco for: