Gardner, KS vs McKinney, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Gardner
76
#395 nationally
McKinney
73.5
#726 nationally
Gardner leads in average commute (24 min vs 30.2 min). McKinney leads in median household income ($108,542 vs $91,232). Gardner leads in cost of living index (101 vs 111).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Gardner, KS | McKinney, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76 (#395) | 73.5 (#726) |
| Population | 25,378 | 208,867 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $355,396 | $480,265 |
| Median Household Income | $91,232 | $108,542 |
| Average Commute | 24 min | 30.2 min |
| Walk Score | 24 | 24 |
| Crime Level | 3.8 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 8.8 |
| Cost of Living Index | 101 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+8.5 | R+11.2 |
C
76 Score
Gardner, KS
Small Kansas city with local appeal
Median Home
$355,396
Population
25,378
Crime
Low
Walk Score
24
Midwest
View Gardner, KS →
C
73.5 Score
McKinney, TX
Historic downtown meets modern growth
Median Home
$480,265
Population
208,867
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Southwest
View McKinney, TX →