Garland, TX vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Garland
73.2
#772 nationally
Omaha
74.7
#567 nationally
Omaha leads in average commute (20.4 min vs 29.7 min). Omaha leads in cost of living index (91 vs 102). Garland leads in median household income ($71,044 vs $65,562).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Garland, TX | Omaha, NE |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.2 (#772) | 74.7 (#567) |
| Population | 243,470 | 492,374 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $287,246 | $299,344 |
| Median Household Income | $71,044 | $65,562 |
| Average Commute | 29.7 min | 20.4 min |
| Walk Score | 40 | 43 |
| Crime Level | 6.4 | Moderate |
| School Rating | N/A | 7.4 |
| Cost of Living Index | 102 | 91 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+22.2 | D+10.2 |
C
73.2 Score
Garland, TX
Growing Texas city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$287,246
Population
243,470
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
40
Southwest
View Garland, TX →
C
74.7 Score
Omaha, NE
Warren Buffett's hometown with heartland values
Median Home
$299,344
Population
492,374
Crime
Moderate
Schools
B+
Midwest
View Omaha, NE →