Garner, NC vs South Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Garner
68.5
#1312 nationally
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
South Pasadena leads in walk score (67 vs 23). Garner leads in cost of living index (106 vs 228). South Pasadena leads in crime level (5.8 vs 9.8).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Garner, NC | South Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 68.5 (#1312) | 63.6 (#1760) |
| Population | 35,265 | 25,623 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $385,396 | $1,707,701 |
| Median Household Income | $77,171 | $127,882 |
| Average Commute | 27.8 min | 30.6 min |
| Walk Score | 23 | 67 |
| Crime Level | 9.8 | 5.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 106 | 228 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+25.6 | D+32.9 |
D+
68.5 Score
Garner, NC
Small North Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$385,396
Population
35,265
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
23
Southeast
View Garner, NC →
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Garner for: