Grayslake, IL vs Kirkland, WA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Kirkland
68
#1358 nationally
Kirkland leads in walk score (51 vs 28). Grayslake leads in cost of living index (108 vs 179). Kirkland leads in median household income ($135,608 vs $110,662).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Grayslake, IL | Kirkland, WA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.3 (#362) | 68 (#1358) |
| Population | 20,954 | 91,194 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $374,561 | $1,212,741 |
| Median Household Income | $110,662 | $135,608 |
| Average Commute | 28.7 min | 25.5 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 51 |
| Crime Level | 1.8 | 1.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 108 | 179 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+20.8 | D+51.7 |
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
D+
68 Score
Kirkland, WA
Washington community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$1,212,741
Population
91,194
Crime
Low
Walk Score
51
Pacific
View Kirkland, WA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Grayslake for: