Grayslake, IL vs Mount Pleasant, WI
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Mount Pleasant
75.8
#417 nationally
Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 3.1). Grayslake leads in walk score (28 vs 20). Mount Pleasant leads in average commute (20.9 min vs 28.7 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Grayslake, IL | Mount Pleasant, WI |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.3 (#362) | 75.8 (#417) |
| Population | 20,954 | 27,727 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $374,561 | $350,442 |
| Median Household Income | $110,662 | $83,827 |
| Average Commute | 28.7 min | 20.9 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 20 |
| Crime Level | 1.8 | 3.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 108 | 101 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+20.8 | R+6.2 |
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
C
75.8 Score
Mount Pleasant, WI
Small Wisconsin city with local appeal
Median Home
$350,442
Population
27,727
Crime
Low
Walk Score
20
Midwest
View Mount Pleasant, WI →
Try a different matchup
Swap Grayslake for: