Gresham, OR vs Los Angeles, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Gresham
65.6
#1622 nationally
Los Angeles
60.9
#1917 nationally
Los Angeles leads in walk score (68 vs 47). Gresham leads in cost of living index (124 vs 173). Gresham leads in average commute (27.5 min vs 31.4 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Gresham, OR | Los Angeles, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 65.6 (#1622) | 60.9 (#1917) |
| Population | 110,685 | 3,822,238 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $470,730 | $946,268 |
| Median Household Income | $69,437 | $74,891 |
| Average Commute | 27.5 min | 31.4 min |
| Walk Score | 47 | 68 |
| Crime Level | 11.2 | Moderate-High |
| School Rating | N/A | 5.4 |
| Cost of Living Index | 124 | 173 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+62.1 | D+32.9 |
D
65.6 Score
Gresham, OR
Mid-size Oregon city with community character
Median Home
$470,730
Population
110,685
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
47
Pacific
View Gresham, OR →
D-
60.9 Score
Los Angeles, CA
Entertainment capital of the world
Median Home
$946,268
Population
3,822,238
Crime
Moderate-High
Schools
C
Pacific
View Los Angeles, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Gresham for: