Hanford, CA vs Little Elm, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Hanford
68.4
#1319 nationally
Little Elm
72.2
#919 nationally
Little Elm leads in crime level (3.7 vs 13.2). Hanford leads in average commute (23.6 min vs 37.9 min). Hanford leads in walk score (36 vs 24).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Hanford, CA | Little Elm, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 68.4 (#1319) | 72.2 (#919) |
| Population | 59,938 | 58,496 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $385,755 | $400,423 |
| Median Household Income | $73,819 | $110,218 |
| Average Commute | 23.6 min | 37.9 min |
| Walk Score | 36 | 24 |
| Crime Level | 13.2 | 3.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 116 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+23.0 | R+13.2 |
D+
68.4 Score
Hanford, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$385,755
Population
59,938
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
36
Pacific
View Hanford, CA →
C-
72.2 Score
Little Elm, TX
Texas community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$400,423
Population
58,496
Crime
Low
Walk Score
24
Southwest
View Little Elm, TX →