Harrisburg, NC vs Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Harrisburg
69.3
#1226 nationally
Pasadena
61.6
#1898 nationally
Harrisburg leads in crime level (4.2 vs 13.2). Harrisburg leads in cost of living index (118 vs 197). Harrisburg leads in median household income ($134,767 vs $97,818).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Harrisburg, NC | Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.3 (#1226) | 61.6 (#1898) |
| Population | 19,883 | 133,560 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $500,007 | $1,206,740 |
| Median Household Income | $134,767 | $97,818 |
| Average Commute | 30.3 min | 27.9 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 69 |
| Crime Level | 4.2 | 13.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 197 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+7.7 | D+32.9 |
Data coverage note: Harrisburg is missing data for 1 metric that Pasadena has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D+
69.3 Score
Harrisburg, NC
Small North Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$500,007
Population
19,883
Crime
Moderate-Low
Median Income
$134,767
Southeast
View Harrisburg, NC →
D-
61.6 Score
Pasadena, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,206,740
Population
133,560
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
69
Pacific
View Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Harrisburg for: