Holladay, UT vs Mount Pleasant, SC
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Holladay
69.6
#1185 nationally
Mount Pleasant
67.1
#1462 nationally
Holladay leads in walk score (36 vs 22). Holladay leads in average commute (19.4 min vs 25.2 min). Holladay leads in crime level (2.7 vs 3.5).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Holladay, UT | Mount Pleasant, SC |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.6 (#1185) | 67.1 (#1462) |
| Population | 30,298 | 95,232 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $851,133 | $881,446 |
| Median Household Income | $106,099 | $115,167 |
| Average Commute | 19.4 min | 25.2 min |
| Walk Score | 36 | 22 |
| Crime Level | 2.7 | 3.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 139 | 140 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+10.2 | D+5.7 |
D+
69.6 Score
Holladay, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$851,133
Population
30,298
Crime
Low
Walk Score
36
West
View Holladay, UT →
D+
67.1 Score
Mount Pleasant, SC
South Carolina community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$881,446
Population
95,232
Crime
Low
Walk Score
22
Southeast
View Mount Pleasant, SC →
Try a different matchup
Swap Holladay for: