Irvine, CA vs Lacey, WA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Irvine
67.2
#1452 nationally
Lacey
68.1
#1347 nationally
Irvine leads in walk score (44 vs 29). Lacey leads in cost of living index (122 vs 178). Irvine leads in median household income ($116,519 vs $79,874).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Irvine, CA | Lacey, WA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.2 (#1452) | 68.1 (#1347) |
| Population | 307,670 | 58,326 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,517,431 | $517,030 |
| Median Household Income | $116,519 | $79,874 |
| Average Commute | 25.8 min | 25.7 min |
| Walk Score | 44 | 29 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 5.1 |
| School Rating | 9.5 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 178 | 122 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+2.6 | D+20.4 |
D+
67.2 Score
Irvine, CA
Master-planned perfection in Southern California
Median Home
$1,517,431
Population
307,670
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Pacific
View Irvine, CA →
D+
68.1 Score
Lacey, WA
Washington community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$517,030
Population
58,326
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Lacey, WA →