Irvine, CA vs Murfreesboro, TN
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Irvine
67.2
#1452 nationally
Murfreesboro
65
#1659 nationally
Irvine leads in walk score (44 vs 25). Irvine leads in median household income ($116,519 vs $70,451). Murfreesboro leads in cost of living index (109 vs 178).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Irvine, CA | Murfreesboro, TN |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.2 (#1452) | 65 (#1659) |
| Population | 307,670 | 165,430 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,517,431 | $430,142 |
| Median Household Income | $116,519 | $70,451 |
| Average Commute | 25.8 min | 27.3 min |
| Walk Score | 44 | 25 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 11.5 |
| School Rating | 9.5 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 178 | 109 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+2.6 | R+21.8 |
D+
67.2 Score
Irvine, CA
Master-planned perfection in Southern California
Median Home
$1,517,431
Population
307,670
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Pacific
View Irvine, CA →
D
65 Score
Murfreesboro, TN
Mid-size Tennessee city with community character
Median Home
$430,142
Population
165,430
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
25
Southeast
View Murfreesboro, TN →
Try a different matchup
Swap Irvine for: