Irvine, CA vs Spanish Fork, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Irvine
67.2
#1452 nationally
Spanish Fork
72.6
#866 nationally
Spanish Fork leads in cost of living index (118 vs 178). Irvine leads in walk score (44 vs 30). Spanish Fork leads in average commute (20.2 min vs 25.8 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Irvine, CA | Spanish Fork, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.2 (#1452) | 72.6 (#866) |
| Population | 307,670 | 45,557 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,517,431 | $520,115 |
| Median Household Income | $116,519 | $93,989 |
| Average Commute | 25.8 min | 20.2 min |
| Walk Score | 44 | 30 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 2.1 |
| School Rating | 9.5 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 178 | 118 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+2.6 | R+39.8 |
D+
67.2 Score
Irvine, CA
Master-planned perfection in Southern California
Median Home
$1,517,431
Population
307,670
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Pacific
View Irvine, CA →
C-
72.6 Score
Spanish Fork, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$520,115
Population
45,557
Crime
Low
Walk Score
30
West
View Spanish Fork, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Irvine for: