Irving, TX vs Pleasant Hill, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Irving
73.1
#789 nationally
Pleasant Hill
64.1
#1719 nationally
Irving leads in cost of living index (103 vs 191). Pleasant Hill leads in median household income ($137,685 vs $76,686). Irving leads in average commute (23.8 min vs 32.3 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Irving, TX | Pleasant Hill, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.1 (#789) | 64.1 (#1719) |
| Population | 254,373 | 33,802 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $343,364 | $992,042 |
| Median Household Income | $76,686 | $137,685 |
| Average Commute | 23.8 min | 32.3 min |
| Walk Score | 45 | 54 |
| Crime Level | 7.5 | 6.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 103 | 191 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+22.2 | D+38.0 |
C
73.1 Score
Irving, TX
Growing Texas city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$343,364
Population
254,373
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
45
Southwest
View Irving, TX →
D
64.1 Score
Pleasant Hill, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$992,042
Population
33,802
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
54
Pacific
View Pleasant Hill, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Irving for:
Swap Pleasant Hill for: