Kingman, AZ vs Lacey, WA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Kingman
73.6
#703 nationally
Lacey
68.1
#1347 nationally
Lacey leads in median household income ($79,874 vs $56,360). Kingman leads in average commute (18.2 min vs 25.7 min). Kingman leads in cost of living index (99 vs 122).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Kingman, AZ | Lacey, WA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.6 (#703) | 68.1 (#1347) |
| Population | 35,334 | 58,326 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $275,989 | $517,030 |
| Median Household Income | $56,360 | $79,874 |
| Average Commute | 18.2 min | 25.7 min |
| Walk Score | 25 | 29 |
| Crime Level | 6.1 | 5.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 99 | 122 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+55.8 | D+20.4 |
C
73.6 Score
Kingman, AZ
Small Arizona city with local appeal
Median Home
$275,989
Population
35,334
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
25
Southwest
View Kingman, AZ →
D+
68.1 Score
Lacey, WA
Washington community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$517,030
Population
58,326
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Lacey, WA →