Lacey, WA vs Livermore, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Lacey
68.1
#1347 nationally
Livermore
63.1
#1797 nationally
Livermore leads in median household income ($152,590 vs $79,874). Lacey leads in cost of living index (122 vs 197). Livermore leads in walk score (41 vs 29).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Lacey, WA | Livermore, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 68.1 (#1347) | 63.1 (#1797) |
| Population | 58,326 | 82,908 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $517,030 | $1,087,999 |
| Median Household Income | $79,874 | $152,590 |
| Average Commute | 25.7 min | 31.3 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 122 | 197 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+20.4 | D+53.6 |
D+
68.1 Score
Lacey, WA
Washington community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$517,030
Population
58,326
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Lacey, WA →
D
63.1 Score
Livermore, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$1,087,999
Population
82,908
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Livermore, CA →