Lacey, WA vs Mauldin, SC
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Lacey
68.1
#1347 nationally
Mauldin
73.5
#725 nationally
Lacey leads in walk score (29 vs 20). Mauldin leads in cost of living index (100 vs 122). Mauldin leads in average commute (21.4 min vs 25.7 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Lacey, WA | Mauldin, SC |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 68.1 (#1347) | 73.5 (#725) |
| Population | 58,326 | 28,010 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $517,030 | $299,697 |
| Median Household Income | $79,874 | $75,565 |
| Average Commute | 25.7 min | 21.4 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 20 |
| Crime Level | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 122 | 100 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+20.4 | R+22.2 |
D+
68.1 Score
Lacey, WA
Washington community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$517,030
Population
58,326
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Lacey, WA →
C
73.5 Score
Mauldin, SC
Small South Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$299,697
Population
28,010
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
20
Southeast
View Mauldin, SC →