Lancaster, CA vs Pascagoula, MS
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Lancaster
61.5
#1905 nationally
Pascagoula
80.2
#90 nationally
Pascagoula leads in crime level (8.9 vs 22.9). Lancaster leads in median household income ($71,367 vs $41,679). Pascagoula leads in average commute (18.3 min vs 30.9 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Lancaster, CA | Pascagoula, MS |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.5 (#1905) | 80.2 (#90) |
| Population | 166,236 | 21,582 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $465,459 | $142,299 |
| Median Household Income | $71,367 | $41,679 |
| Average Commute | 30.9 min | 18.3 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 33 |
| Crime Level | 22.9 | 8.9 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 126 | 88 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | R+39.9 |
D-
61.5 Score
Lancaster, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$465,459
Population
166,236
Crime
High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Lancaster, CA →
B-
80.2 Score
Pascagoula, MS
Small Mississippi city with local appeal
Median Home
$142,299
Population
21,582
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
33
Southeast
View Pascagoula, MS →
Try a different matchup
Swap Lancaster for: