Lancaster, CA vs Port Orange, FL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Lancaster
61.5
#1905 nationally
Port Orange
69.5
#1201 nationally
Port Orange leads in crime level (7.1 vs 22.9). Lancaster leads in walk score (29 vs 20). Port Orange leads in average commute (24.1 min vs 30.9 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Lancaster, CA | Port Orange, FL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.5 (#1905) | 69.5 (#1201) |
| Population | 166,236 | 65,966 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $465,459 | $339,724 |
| Median Household Income | $71,367 | $65,026 |
| Average Commute | 30.9 min | 24.1 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 20 |
| Crime Level | 22.9 | 7.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 126 | 108 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | R+21.8 |
D-
61.5 Score
Lancaster, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$465,459
Population
166,236
Crime
High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Lancaster, CA →
D+
69.5 Score
Port Orange, FL
Florida community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$339,724
Population
65,966
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
20
Southeast
View Port Orange, FL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Lancaster for: