Lancaster, TX vs South Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Lancaster
69.9
#1155 nationally
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
South Pasadena leads in walk score (67 vs 22). Lancaster leads in cost of living index (98 vs 228). South Pasadena leads in median household income ($127,882 vs $65,323).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Lancaster, TX | South Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.9 (#1155) | 63.6 (#1760) |
| Population | 40,215 | 25,623 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $273,149 | $1,707,701 |
| Median Household Income | $65,323 | $127,882 |
| Average Commute | 29.7 min | 30.6 min |
| Walk Score | 22 | 67 |
| Crime Level | 11.2 | 5.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 98 | 228 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+22.2 | D+32.9 |
D+
69.9 Score
Lancaster, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$273,149
Population
40,215
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
22
Southwest
View Lancaster, TX →
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Lancaster for: