Largo, FL vs Taylorsville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Largo
70.8
#1058 nationally
Taylorsville
68.6
#1308 nationally
Taylorsville leads in median household income ($81,417 vs $56,266). Taylorsville leads in crime level (6.3 vs 9.0). Largo leads in walk score (43 vs 35).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Largo, FL | Taylorsville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 70.8 (#1058) | 68.6 (#1308) |
| Population | 82,248 | 57,098 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $340,214 | $499,374 |
| Median Household Income | $56,266 | $81,417 |
| Average Commute | 23.5 min | 21.6 min |
| Walk Score | 43 | 35 |
| Crime Level | 9.0 | 6.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 99 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+5.2 | D+10.2 |
C-
70.8 Score
Largo, FL
Florida community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$340,214
Population
82,248
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
43
Southeast
View Largo, FL →
D+
68.6 Score
Taylorsville, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$499,374
Population
57,098
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
35
West
View Taylorsville, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Largo for: