Lincoln, CA vs Taylorsville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Lincoln
72.8
#830 nationally
Taylorsville
68.6
#1308 nationally
Lincoln leads in crime level (2.6 vs 6.3). Lincoln leads in walk score (84 vs 35). Taylorsville leads in cost of living index (111 vs 153).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Lincoln, CA | Taylorsville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.8 (#830) | 68.6 (#1308) |
| Population | 54,538 | 57,098 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $645,264 | $499,374 |
| Median Household Income | $99,434 | $81,417 |
| Average Commute | 29.3 min | 21.6 min |
| Walk Score | 84 | 35 |
| Crime Level | 2.6 | 6.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 153 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+8.5 | D+10.2 |
C-
72.8 Score
Lincoln, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$645,264
Population
54,538
Crime
Low
Walk Score
84
Pacific
View Lincoln, CA →
D+
68.6 Score
Taylorsville, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$499,374
Population
57,098
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
35
West
View Taylorsville, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Lincoln for: