Little Elm, TX vs San Fernando, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Little Elm
72.2
#919 nationally
San Fernando
65.7
#1616 nationally
San Fernando leads in walk score (79 vs 24). Little Elm leads in crime level (3.7 vs 9.9). Little Elm leads in median household income ($110,218 vs $70,950).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Little Elm, TX | San Fernando, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.2 (#919) | 65.7 (#1616) |
| Population | 58,496 | 23,364 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $400,423 | $752,797 |
| Median Household Income | $110,218 | $70,950 |
| Average Commute | 37.9 min | 29.5 min |
| Walk Score | 24 | 79 |
| Crime Level | 3.7 | 9.9 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 116 | 150 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+13.2 | D+32.9 |
C-
72.2 Score
Little Elm, TX
Texas community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$400,423
Population
58,496
Crime
Low
Walk Score
24
Southwest
View Little Elm, TX →
D
65.7 Score
San Fernando, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$752,797
Population
23,364
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
79
Pacific
View San Fernando, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Little Elm for: