Livermore, CA vs Mauldin, SC
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Livermore
63.1
#1797 nationally
Mauldin
73.5
#725 nationally
Livermore leads in walk score (41 vs 20). Livermore leads in median household income ($152,590 vs $75,565). Mauldin leads in cost of living index (100 vs 197).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Livermore, CA | Mauldin, SC |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.1 (#1797) | 73.5 (#725) |
| Population | 82,908 | 28,010 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,087,999 | $299,697 |
| Median Household Income | $152,590 | $75,565 |
| Average Commute | 31.3 min | 21.4 min |
| Walk Score | 41 | 20 |
| Crime Level | 6.4 | 6.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 197 | 100 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+53.6 | R+22.2 |
D
63.1 Score
Livermore, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$1,087,999
Population
82,908
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Livermore, CA →
C
73.5 Score
Mauldin, SC
Small South Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$299,697
Population
28,010
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
20
Southeast
View Mauldin, SC →