McKinney, TX vs Mount Pleasant, WI
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
McKinney
73.5
#726 nationally
Mount Pleasant
75.8
#417 nationally
Mount Pleasant leads in average commute (20.9 min vs 30.2 min). McKinney leads in median household income ($108,542 vs $83,827). McKinney leads in walk score (24 vs 20).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | McKinney, TX | Mount Pleasant, WI |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.5 (#726) | 75.8 (#417) |
| Population | 208,867 | 27,727 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $480,265 | $350,442 |
| Median Household Income | $108,542 | $83,827 |
| Average Commute | 30.2 min | 20.9 min |
| Walk Score | 24 | 20 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 3.1 |
| School Rating | 8.8 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 111 | 101 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+11.2 | R+6.2 |
C
73.5 Score
McKinney, TX
Historic downtown meets modern growth
Median Home
$480,265
Population
208,867
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Southwest
View McKinney, TX →
C
75.8 Score
Mount Pleasant, WI
Small Wisconsin city with local appeal
Median Home
$350,442
Population
27,727
Crime
Low
Walk Score
20
Midwest
View Mount Pleasant, WI →
Try a different matchup
Swap McKinney for: