Melbourne, FL vs Newark, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Melbourne
69.9
#1158 nationally
Newark
62.4
#1861 nationally
Newark leads in median household income ($159,465 vs $60,917). Melbourne leads in cost of living index (105 vs 195). Newark leads in walk score (57 vs 33).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Melbourne, FL | Newark, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.9 (#1158) | 62.4 (#1861) |
| Population | 86,960 | 46,929 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $360,012 | $1,202,648 |
| Median Household Income | $60,917 | $159,465 |
| Average Commute | 22.5 min | 31.2 min |
| Walk Score | 33 | 57 |
| Crime Level | 7.6 | 10.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 105 | 195 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+20.8 | D+53.6 |
D+
69.9 Score
Melbourne, FL
Florida community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$360,012
Population
86,960
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
33
Southeast
View Melbourne, FL →
D-
62.4 Score
Newark, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,202,648
Population
46,929
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
57
Pacific
View Newark, CA →