Melbourne, FL vs Siloam Springs, AR
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Melbourne
69.9
#1158 nationally
Siloam Springs
69.2
#1245 nationally
Melbourne leads in crime level (7.6 vs 13.6). Siloam Springs leads in cost of living index (91 vs 105). Siloam Springs leads in average commute (19.6 min vs 22.5 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Melbourne, FL | Siloam Springs, AR |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.9 (#1158) | 69.2 (#1245) |
| Population | 86,960 | 19,336 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $360,012 | $286,237 |
| Median Household Income | $60,917 | $59,911 |
| Average Commute | 22.5 min | 19.6 min |
| Walk Score | 33 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 7.6 | 13.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 105 | 91 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+20.8 | R+27.0 |
Data coverage note: Siloam Springs is missing data for 1 metric that Melbourne has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D+
69.9 Score
Melbourne, FL
Florida community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$360,012
Population
86,960
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
33
Southeast
View Melbourne, FL →
D+
69.2 Score
Siloam Springs, AR
Small Arkansas city with local appeal
Median Home
$286,237
Population
19,336
Crime
Moderate-High
Median Income
$59,911
Southwest
View Siloam Springs, AR →
Try a different matchup
Swap Melbourne for: