Milpitas, CA vs Taylorsville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Milpitas
64
#1724 nationally
Taylorsville
68.6
#1308 nationally
Milpitas leads in median household income ($166,769 vs $81,417). Taylorsville leads in cost of living index (111 vs 217). Milpitas leads in walk score (54 vs 35).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Milpitas, CA | Taylorsville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 64 (#1724) | 68.6 (#1308) |
| Population | 77,321 | 57,098 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,424,179 | $499,374 |
| Median Household Income | $166,769 | $81,417 |
| Average Commute | 26.6 min | 21.6 min |
| Walk Score | 54 | 35 |
| Crime Level | 8.6 | 6.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 217 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+40.0 | D+10.2 |
D
64 Score
Milpitas, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$1,424,179
Population
77,321
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
54
Pacific
View Milpitas, CA →
D+
68.6 Score
Taylorsville, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$499,374
Population
57,098
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
35
West
View Taylorsville, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Milpitas for: