Mount Pleasant, SC vs South Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Mount Pleasant
67.1
#1462 nationally
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
South Pasadena leads in walk score (67 vs 22). Mount Pleasant leads in crime level (3.5 vs 5.8). Mount Pleasant leads in cost of living index (140 vs 228).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Mount Pleasant, SC | South Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.1 (#1462) | 63.6 (#1760) |
| Population | 95,232 | 25,623 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $881,446 | $1,707,701 |
| Median Household Income | $115,167 | $127,882 |
| Average Commute | 25.2 min | 30.6 min |
| Walk Score | 22 | 67 |
| Crime Level | 3.5 | 5.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 140 | 228 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+5.7 | D+32.9 |
D+
67.1 Score
Mount Pleasant, SC
South Carolina community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$881,446
Population
95,232
Crime
Low
Walk Score
22
Southeast
View Mount Pleasant, SC →
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Mount Pleasant for: