Murfreesboro, TN vs Reedley, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Murfreesboro
65
#1659 nationally
Reedley
66.5
#1539 nationally
Reedley leads in walk score (50 vs 25). Murfreesboro leads in crime level (11.5 vs 15.5). Reedley leads in average commute (23.4 min vs 27.3 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Murfreesboro, TN | Reedley, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 65 (#1659) | 66.5 (#1539) |
| Population | 165,430 | 25,958 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $430,142 | $391,683 |
| Median Household Income | $70,451 | $61,629 |
| Average Commute | 27.3 min | 23.4 min |
| Walk Score | 25 | 50 |
| Crime Level | 11.5 | 15.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 109 | 117 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+21.8 | R+4.4 |
D
65 Score
Murfreesboro, TN
Mid-size Tennessee city with community character
Median Home
$430,142
Population
165,430
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
25
Southeast
View Murfreesboro, TN →
D
66.5 Score
Reedley, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$391,683
Population
25,958
Crime
High
Walk Score
50
Pacific
View Reedley, CA →