Newark, NJ vs Reedley, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Newark
62.7
#1835 nationally
Reedley
66.5
#1539 nationally
Newark leads in walk score (76 vs 50). Reedley leads in average commute (23.4 min vs 33 min). Reedley leads in median household income ($61,629 vs $46,460).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Newark, NJ | Reedley, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.7 (#1835) | 66.5 (#1539) |
| Population | 304,960 | 25,958 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $481,883 | $391,683 |
| Median Household Income | $46,460 | $61,629 |
| Average Commute | 33 min | 23.4 min |
| Walk Score | 76 | 50 |
| Crime Level | 15.9 | 15.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 120 | 117 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+44.9 | R+4.4 |
D-
62.7 Score
Newark, NJ
Growing New Jersey city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$481,883
Population
304,960
Crime
High
Walk Score
76
Northeast
View Newark, NJ →
D
66.5 Score
Reedley, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$391,683
Population
25,958
Crime
High
Walk Score
50
Pacific
View Reedley, CA →