North Richland Hills, TX vs South Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
North Richland Hills
71.2
#1010 nationally
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
North Richland Hills leads in cost of living index (107 vs 228). South Pasadena leads in walk score (67 vs 33). South Pasadena leads in median household income ($127,882 vs $88,656).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | North Richland Hills, TX | South Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 71.2 (#1010) | 63.6 (#1760) |
| Population | 70,658 | 25,623 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $370,431 | $1,707,701 |
| Median Household Income | $88,656 | $127,882 |
| Average Commute | 27.6 min | 30.6 min |
| Walk Score | 33 | 67 |
| Crime Level | 6.1 | 5.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 107 | 228 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+5.1 | D+32.9 |
C-
71.2 Score
North Richland Hills, TX
Texas community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$370,431
Population
70,658
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
33
Southwest
View North Richland Hills, TX →
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap North Richland Hills for: