Oakland, CA vs Taylorsville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Oakland
62
#1880 nationally
Taylorsville
68.6
#1308 nationally
Oakland leads in walk score (73 vs 35). Taylorsville leads in average commute (21.6 min vs 32.1 min). Taylorsville leads in cost of living index (111 vs 155).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Oakland, CA | Taylorsville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62 (#1880) | 68.6 (#1308) |
| Population | 433,823 | 57,098 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $717,798 | $499,374 |
| Median Household Income | $85,459 | $81,417 |
| Average Commute | 32.1 min | 21.6 min |
| Walk Score | 73 | 35 |
| Crime Level | High | 6.3 |
| School Rating | 4.8 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 155 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+53.6 | D+10.2 |
D-
62 Score
Oakland, CA
Gritty, diverse, and full of culture
Median Home
$717,798
Population
433,823
Crime
High
Schools
C
Pacific
View Oakland, CA →
D+
68.6 Score
Taylorsville, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$499,374
Population
57,098
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
35
West
View Taylorsville, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Oakland for: