Palm Springs, CA vs Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Palm Springs
61.2
#1915 nationally
Pasadena
61.6
#1898 nationally
Pasadena leads in walk score (69 vs 35). Pasadena leads in median household income ($97,818 vs $67,451). Palm Springs leads in cost of living index (138 vs 197).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Palm Springs, CA | Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.2 (#1915) | 61.6 (#1898) |
| Population | 45,218 | 133,560 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $617,269 | $1,206,740 |
| Median Household Income | $67,451 | $97,818 |
| Average Commute | 23 min | 27.9 min |
| Walk Score | 35 | 69 |
| Crime Level | 16.5 | 13.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 138 | 197 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | D+32.9 |
D-
61.2 Score
Palm Springs, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$617,269
Population
45,218
Crime
High
Walk Score
35
Pacific
View Palm Springs, CA →
D-
61.6 Score
Pasadena, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,206,740
Population
133,560
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
69
Pacific
View Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Palm Springs for: