Palo Alto, CA vs South Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Palo Alto
67.4
#1429 nationally
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
Palo Alto leads in median household income ($214,118 vs $127,882). Palo Alto leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 30.6 min). South Pasadena leads in walk score (67 vs 61).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Palo Alto, CA | South Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.4 (#1429) | 63.6 (#1760) |
| Population | 65,882 | 25,623 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $3,599,324 | $1,707,701 |
| Median Household Income | $214,118 | $127,882 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 30.6 min |
| Walk Score | 61 | 67 |
| Crime Level | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | N/A | 228 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+40.0 | D+32.9 |
D+
67.4 Score
Palo Alto, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$3,599,324
Population
65,882
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
61
Pacific
View Palo Alto, CA →
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Palo Alto for: