Port Orange, FL vs Taylorsville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Port Orange
69.5
#1201 nationally
Taylorsville
68.6
#1308 nationally
Taylorsville leads in walk score (35 vs 20). Taylorsville leads in median household income ($81,417 vs $65,026). Taylorsville leads in crime level (6.3 vs 7.1).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Port Orange, FL | Taylorsville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.5 (#1201) | 68.6 (#1308) |
| Population | 65,966 | 57,098 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $339,724 | $499,374 |
| Median Household Income | $65,026 | $81,417 |
| Average Commute | 24.1 min | 21.6 min |
| Walk Score | 20 | 35 |
| Crime Level | 7.1 | 6.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 108 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+21.8 | D+10.2 |
D+
69.5 Score
Port Orange, FL
Florida community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$339,724
Population
65,966
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
20
Southeast
View Port Orange, FL →
D+
68.6 Score
Taylorsville, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$499,374
Population
57,098
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
35
West
View Taylorsville, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Port Orange for: