Richmond, CA vs Taylorsville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Richmond
60.3
#1940 nationally
Taylorsville
68.6
#1308 nationally
Taylorsville leads in crime level (6.3 vs 25.3). Richmond leads in walk score (59 vs 35). Taylorsville leads in average commute (21.6 min vs 34.6 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Richmond, CA | Taylorsville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 60.3 (#1940) | 68.6 (#1308) |
| Population | 114,106 | 57,098 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $610,065 | $499,374 |
| Median Household Income | $86,618 | $81,417 |
| Average Commute | 34.6 min | 21.6 min |
| Walk Score | 59 | 35 |
| Crime Level | 25.3 | 6.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 155 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+38.0 | D+10.2 |
D-
60.3 Score
Richmond, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$610,065
Population
114,106
Crime
Very High
Walk Score
59
Pacific
View Richmond, CA →
D+
68.6 Score
Taylorsville, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$499,374
Population
57,098
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
35
West
View Taylorsville, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Richmond for: