Riverside, CA vs Saratoga Springs, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Riverside
60.4
#1938 nationally
Saratoga Springs
69.3
#1232 nationally
Saratoga Springs leads in crime level (2.5 vs 16.2). Riverside leads in walk score (43 vs 7). Saratoga Springs leads in median household income ($117,005 vs $83,448).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Riverside, CA | Saratoga Springs, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 60.4 (#1938) | 69.3 (#1232) |
| Population | 318,858 | 52,532 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $650,289 | $558,519 |
| Median Household Income | $83,448 | $117,005 |
| Average Commute | 31.3 min | 28.4 min |
| Walk Score | 43 | 7 |
| Crime Level | 16.2 | 2.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 140 | 129 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | R+39.8 |
D-
60.4 Score
Riverside, CA
Growing California city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$650,289
Population
318,858
Crime
High
Walk Score
43
Pacific
View Riverside, CA →
D+
69.3 Score
Saratoga Springs, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$558,519
Population
52,532
Crime
Low
Walk Score
7
West
View Saratoga Springs, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Riverside for: