Saco, ME vs South Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Saco
69.7
#1178 nationally
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
South Pasadena leads in walk score (67 vs 24). Saco leads in crime level (2.2 vs 5.8). Saco leads in cost of living index (116 vs 228).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Saco, ME | South Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.7 (#1178) | 63.6 (#1760) |
| Population | 20,960 | 25,623 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $531,575 | $1,707,701 |
| Median Household Income | $81,326 | $127,882 |
| Average Commute | 24.4 min | 30.6 min |
| Walk Score | 24 | 67 |
| Crime Level | 2.2 | 5.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 116 | 228 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+10.5 | D+32.9 |
D+
69.7 Score
Saco, ME
Small Maine city with local appeal
Median Home
$531,575
Population
20,960
Crime
Low
Walk Score
24
Northeast
View Saco, ME →
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Saco for:
Swap South Pasadena for: